One screen for the question every committee actually asks: what could make this deal go wrong? Live CMS facility data, your deal terms, and your market read — scored across seven risk domains with the weights disclosed. Modeled screening only; the documentation layer is verified by chart-level review.
Every input above is top-of-ladder: market, financials, ratings, staffing. Whether the target's revenue is documentation-supported — under-billed upside that funds the thesis, or unsupported billing that survives closing as your liability — is invisible to public data and to standard Quality of Earnings. It is established only by chart-level review under facility authorization and BAA, with every finding cited to its source note. That verification is the engagement this screen is designed to scope.
A screening recommendation is a triage decision, not a verdict on the deal. It states whether this facility earns diligence resources under the stated thesis — nothing more. Final judgment belongs to verification: the data room, the surveys, and the charts.
Basis & limitations. Facility data is retrieved live from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (Care Compare — nursing homes) at the time of screening; deal and market inputs are supplied by the user and are not verified. The composite score is a modeled screening heuristic with disclosed weights (v1.0) — it is not an audit, a rating, credit or investment advice, or a substitute for professional diligence, and must not be the basis of any transaction decision. No PHI is requested, accessed, or stored. Documentation-layer estimates are modeled from public proxies only; verification requires chart-level analysis performed with facility authorization. © DRL Holdings.