Confidential · Acquisition diligence

Acquisitions

Pre-close chart intelligence for skilled nursing acquisitions. Look up any target by CCN or name, then underwrite documentation-backed revenue quality, audit exposure, survey probability, and valuation before funds are wired.

Product DRL Holdings Intelligence Audience PE · Strategic buyers · Platform operators Posture Evidence-only · Flat-fee · BAA-first

The diligence gap

Financials show the story management wants. Charts show the one CMS will audit.

Buyers underwrite census, rate, and labor — then inherit documentation risk that never appeared in the CIM. Earned-but-unbilled PDPM opportunity and weak chart language both sit in physician notes, nursing notes, therapy, and the MAR.

What acquisitions diligence must answer
Question Public / model layer Chart layer (BAA)
Who is this facility? Live CMS Care Compare + cost-report profile via Facility Lookup
What could go wrong? Acquisition Risk Engine — seven domains, disclosed weights
Is revenue quality real? Leak % / CMI gap / valuation upside in the SNF Risk Workbook Cited opportunities already supported on file
What can go wrong post-close? Survey/audit probability · Monte Carlo DSCR tails Compliance Shield / audit exposure from weak documentation
What is it worth? EBITDAR multiples ± risk ± documentation premium (Sheet 15) Realization rate of chart-supported upside

Public data · Live CMS

Facility lookup

Search any skilled nursing facility by CMS Certification Number or name and receive the facility’s public Medicare profile — ratings, census, ownership, staffing, enforcement history, fine exposure, and cost-report financials — assembled live from CMS Care Compare and the SNF Cost Report public use file. Public data only; no facility records, no PHI. Use this as the first screen on every acquisition target.

Acquisition package

What diligence receives

A chart-backed package your IC can defend — plus the same 15-sheet risk workbook used for lenders, calibrated to buyer questions (upside, audit risk, survey odds, and EV).

Defined outputs
Output Definition Status label
CMS target screen Live public profile from Facility Lookup — stars, staffing, ownership, enforcement, cost-report anchors. Public data
Acquisition Risk Engine Seven-domain composite (regulatory, staffing, census, market, financial, documentation MODELED, ownership) with disclosed weights and red flags. Model v1.0
Opportunity estimate Supported diagnoses or services present in notes but missing or under-documented relative to billed capture — sample $ and annualized facility estimate with confidence range. Modeled → Verified after sample QC
Audit exposure estimate Documentation that is weak or contradictory relative to what was billed — same bases as opportunity, kept separate. Modeled → Verified after sample QC
Survey / audit probability 12-month probabilities for standard survey, complaint survey, and Medicare medical review — transparent risk points from Sheets 05 / 06 / 12. Workbook Sheet 14
Valuation range Low / base / high EV and equity on reported EBITDAR and with documentation upside; REIT/NNN rent coverage view. Workbook Sheet 15
Evidence package Findings cited to note type, date, and author string. Nothing invented for the model. Evidence only

Illustrative underwrite

Demo facility — Example Care Center of Springfield

Same demo facility loaded in the workbook. Numbers are modeled for illustration — not a live target — and show how public signals, chart opportunity, and valuation sit in one acquisition read.

Acquisition snapshot (modeled)
Lens Reading
Facility 120 beds · IL · ~82% occupancy · 3-star overall · no Immediate Jeopardy · agency labor ~18%
Financials TOR $14.5M · EBITDAR $2.27M · EBITDA $1.55M · DSCR 1.58x · LTD $5.1M
Documentation Opportunity Score 68 · Doc Risk Score 42 · ~$620k annualized hidden revenue (~4.4% leak) · CMI gap −0.11
Survey / audit (12 mo) ~39 risk points · standard survey ~46% (ELEVATED) · any survey/audit ~64%
Monte Carlo Mean DSCR ~1.52x · P(DSCR < 1.20x) ~11% · P(DSCR < 1.00x) ~4%
EV (base) ~$17.0M reported EBITDAR · ~$19.6M with doc upside · equity ~$14.5M · EV/bed ~$163k
REIT / lease view EBITDAR / Rent ~3.15x · implied rent at 1.4x ~$1.62M · NNN property value ~$9.6M at 7.5% cap

Differentiator for the deal: a 4.4% chart-supported revenue leak with only moderate audit risk is exactly the value lever acquisitions underwriting should price — not ignore. Full narrative: valuation · Monte Carlo · survey/audit.

Process

Acquisition diligence sequence

Every engagement follows the same mandatory sequence. Deviations are documented before delivery.

Methodology Card · mandatory sequence
Step Action Artifact
1. Target screen Pull CMS Facility Lookup profile (CCN or name). Log ownership, stars, staffing, enforcement, cost-report anchors. Public Target Screen
2. Intake Confirm BAA. Log facility, EMR, date range, sample size, project ID, deal stage. Project Intake Log
3. Extraction Pull only what already exists on the chart; map to standard template. Standardized Data File
4. Dual Review Clinical review + coding/revenue review. Count only documented opportunities. Annotated Findings Log
5. Quantification Sample gap dollars and annualized estimate with confidence range. Opportunity $ separate from Audit Exposure $. Gap Calculation Sheet
6. Risk & value Composite scores, survey/audit probability, Monte Carlo, and EBITDAR valuation with documentation upside. Sheets 07 · 13 · 14 · 15
7. Packaging Translate findings into an IC-ready acquisition memo with evidence package. Final Report + Evidence Package
8. QC & Delivery Second review for methodology adherence. Deliver report + source evidence. Signed-off Deliverable

Report template carries Report ID, generation date, and Methodology v1.1 — see Disclosures on every page.

Guardrails

Commercial and compliance posture

Non-negotiables
Rule Practice
Flat-fee only No contingency on recovered revenue. Acquisition work is scoped and priced before chart access.
BAA before PHI No chart export until a Business Associate Agreement is executed.
Evidence-only Only ICD-10-CM and PDPM opportunities already supported on file. Clinicians validate; nothing upcoded for the deck.
Modeled vs Verified Public screens and workbook illustrations are labeled. Verified figures require a sample under BAA.

Related

Institutional materials
Page Use
Acquisition Risk Engine Seven-domain modeled risk screen — live CMS + deal terms + market read.
PE Acquisition brief Short narrative brief for PE / strategic buyers.
Lender Intelligence Full workbook documentation — CMI, Monte Carlo, survey/audit, valuation.
Facility Lookup Standalone CMS CCN / name tool.
Disclosures Legal furniture and methodology stamps.